There is no requisite “instead of” here. People can apply effort toward a great many causes.

I can deny it will be useful to me. And I can do so without any disparaging comments. I am glad it will be useful for you.

Because you don’t message them generally if they’re away; so away and busy marking helps. The difference you’re describing for not needing to check if somebody is in the office, means you are the sort of person to just show up at somebody’s desk and yap. If not, this new feature gains you no ground, as you’d still need to check if they’re available. If so, you’re already quite unlikable in the workplace.

Yo, I was hoping to chat about fizzing buzzes today. You in the office; wanna grab coffee? If you prefer you can call or we can just chat on slack? Anyway I thought it would be best if we foo’d the bars in that order on project A.

Easy. No naked ping. No pressure. Question already in the open. No expectations. Will find out if able to meet in person. Will get an initial response.

They recently cribbed the Catch Up feature directly from Slack. I’m a big fan of that. Come up with a good feature on their own? Nah.

This is one of the most clever comments I’ve seen in a good while. I hope you meant it to be as funny as it is and that others recognize the double meaning.

Has any merger been rejected in recent decades?

Maybe some sort of longitudinal studies about long term effects. Who knows? But each datum helps.

People will definitely reply about how obvious this is and how we already knew it. But research improving empirical knowledge about any links in any field is still valuable.

Pretty simple solution to that.

Fantastic shot. I really like this one.

Depends what your real tasks are. If they involve writing, researching, watching videos, filling out web exams, etc., yeah, very capable. If you’re compiling massive codebases, editing composited video, or recording several audio channels, obviously not. But that’s the pitch. If you’re a student and want a well built machine at a competitive price with a long battery life, they’re tough to beat.

It bums me out that the corporate misdeeds were so damaging with LLM’s that people say stuff like this. The technology of using backpropagation to tune networks and using high dimensional matrices to predict new vectors itself isn’t toxic. It is fascinating and can be useful. But without focus I can see how it all looks like just ChatGPT hallucinating wrong answers to lazy college students or what have you. That’s painting with pretty broad strokes though.

Fascinating how uttering the term “AI” can cause so many downvotes even when the system is just a harness that runs self hosted and can use completely openweight, even self trained models. Or maybe many on Lemmy just hate pewdiepie.

For a moment I was like, what is this? Some dragon egg?

Fair. I meant proportions/silhouette, not details like lights. I just mistakenly thought those were also part of design.

I seem to be unclear I guess. But to me there is a difference between, “can’t use the same design language” and “can’t look sleek”.

My point is simply that electric vs combustion power distribution and volume / mass differences make it, I assume, difficult to maintain the same design language.

Difficult to use the same design language with massive batteries. I actually think it looks okay. For me the issue is the 700k price tag.

That nvidia one is probably impossible to pin down, since it is really just a big ouroboros investment human centipede eating its own revenue out of all the other asses.