I didn’t even know that was still an option.

By SE, do you mean the Macintosh, or the iPhone?

I’m still not saying that they do, but they could certainly afford to pick up the tab. And it’s primarily trains at issue here.

I didn’t mean to imply that it’s FIFA’s call, but their profits would not be greatly diminished if they were to cover those costs. I agree about the proper course of action, but would never expect that to happen here in the US. It wasn’t a good call to host here to begin with. The infrastructure isn’t there, and didn’t magically appear in the meantime.

FIFA is welcome to make transportation affordable, rather than being a drain on the local economies (and profiting in the billions.) On the other hand, those that can afford a match ticket can afford to spend 1% of that to get to the match.

Hmm, never heard of it, but then I’m not in Chicago anymore. Dumb place to open chain Mexican restaurant. Even Taco Bell barely gets by trying to compete with the cost/quality of the numerous local options.

Isn’t that from the publisher that asked AI how to about paying the developers a bonus?

Not for him!

In the reality where he didn’t embarrass himself.

“John’s Wife and the Night Visitors”

Ah, fascinating. That tracks, I was just realizing that about our local DOT this morning. Registration is enforced more strictly than inspections, so they can’t be said to be prioritizing safety!

Per the article, sometimes they burn up, sometimes they don’t.

The big culprit I was remembering isn’t Starlink, but SpaceX, with the debris being potentially lethal (over 6 feet, too heavy for one person to move.)

From the same professor: https://wlos.com/news/local/professor-spacexs-lack-of-accountability-for-space-debris-frustrating-nasa-samantha-lawlwer-university-of-regina-saskatchewan-canada

Musk’s companies are notorious for lack of responsibility. At least Cards Against Humanity held they’re get to the fire for a minute.

Part of the plan, sure, but that doesn’t mean it’s a good plan. They don’t have control of where the debris lands, and Starlink doesn’t take responsibility for cleanup when it lands on others’ property.

But the reference objects keep getting bigger!

True, but Vance is even less charismatic.

High demand from data centers decreases the supply for consumers, the consumer demand is unaffected.

To protect themselves from the other armed off-duty soldiers, of course

Any resulting violence will justify the need for more guns!

Only when it’s properly funded. But we can do that.

Damage or destroy, sure. But to me, hijacking means taking control of the aircraft, and I don’t see that happening without cockpit access. (Not that doors are impenetrable, but still.)

But they do prevent hijackings…