That’s Tom.

Not saying that’s what’s going on here, but it’s a family name.

They closed the creek over my local road a few days ago…

You wouldn’t rotisserize a car.

Well, not anymore.

Type “chickfila ad” into your favorite whatever.

Apps exist that have you place the phone next to you on the mattress so the accelerometer can track your movement, while the mic tracks snoring and such.

I want this on a Trapper Keeper.

I think that’s pretty close to the original comment that got downvoted. “Look at these ugly people…” is the common denominator, while they didn’t call out the “…who are hypocrites” part.

Still feels like crude moral judgment on ugly people, which pops up in The Far Side too often. Another recent example, specifically how Larson draws the imbeciles’ physical characteristics.

For sure, adherence to design language doesn’t stop these things from being ridiculous.

What’s the joke, then?

Including, but not limited to, putting them in his mouth?

You’re right, shape is also part of design language too, but I don’t think being an EV prevented this from looking like a Ferrari. Body styling cues could make the connection, like the way a Cayenne is a SUV but still looks like what you think of as a Porche. It just seems like Ferrari didn’t want to here, for one reason or another.

This wasn’t designed to appeal to their current customers. Apparently some people like bland EVs and Ferrari want some of that money.

You’re misunderstanding the term. Design language is subtle aesthetic cues, usually not functional, that remind you of other things they’ve made in the past. To suggest that the batteries dictate stuff like the shape of headlights doesn’t make sense.

The kern’el of truth.

Raptored.

!bertstrips@moist.catsweat.com

You would think.

The last time this was posted the top comment explained it.

That was six hours ago. What in the wide, wide world of karma farming is going on here?