You are right from a certain point of view. But a different point of view is more helpful to understand the issue here.

You are completely right, my apologies.

OMG it’s even an AI bot.

but Commodore is.

Commodore isn’t. They don’t exist. Commodore is nothing further than a name out of history.

Somebody is trying right now at the moment to revive it. Then maybe something will exist again.

What a wonderful rant!

Ah, yes, that’s probably it: his rear end is full of shit.

Pichai […]
“It is the last two letters of my last name, after all.”

So, abbreviations start from the rear end now?

No cam on my pc…

(and I’m not even going to tell this little fact to them)

Zuckerberg […] “we’ve made mistakes and will almost certainly make more.”

I read that he is not going to change things. Cheers.

Too bad Teslas will be obsolete quite soon (the cars from this brand, I mean)

They’re a trillion dollar company, they can do whatever the fuck they want as long as the penalty remains fines.

This was one verdict, and from now on they can be fined up to 250k for every time when their AI writes this offensive statement, provoked or not. Note: not every day, but every single time it happens somewhere.

If they don’t do anything about it, then there might come more such verdicts about other similarly offensive statements, and then imagine some people provoke them all repeatedly, systematically…

Can they still ignore them all and do nothing as long as the fuck they want?? ;-)

But they cannot choose their own arbitrary waiting time when legal actions are already ongoing.

Google said it takes swift actions against violations of its policies ​for AI Overviews.

LOL Hasn’t it just been proven right here in this case that the opposite is true?

If I have read the verdict properly, even after being officially noticed and legally requested to stop the offending statements, the company did not react at all and the AI repeated it’s crap.

Are you pikatchu?

One of the most evil people in the whole world.

They did it in one day, but you repeat the news about it after one week…

Have you read the verdict?

Sometimes it does not even matter if it is truth or not.

That may actually be such a case here: Factual statements that can create bad reputation for somebody (or some company).

appears to be impossible with current LLMs

Not the court’s problem.

“Sorry, your honor, my weapon is that faulty so I can never know who it is who will be killed, but I just had to shoot because that’s how I make my money…”

the AI makes its own claims that don’t appear in any linked source, and the operator has to answer for them. […] if it gains traction internationally, the fallout could hit not just Google but every AI provider

And that is a good thing!

We (the world) need at least some basic level of quality and truth in AI generated answers. FINALLY.

Unfortunately, the regional court is the lowest court stage

No. Landgericht is the second stage already.