A firm handshake and eye contact should do the trick!

We all should have hacked the future harder I guess.

Oh I think it is here, people just don’t like to call it.

That’s a good guess, horrible though that is.

Maybe google’s internet. But not the whole thing.

OK, so how does this work for things without cameras? They exist, I am using one right now. Does it just fail, does it default to another method?

Not likely. Just know that AUR is user driven and not checked or vetted.

Wait is this the new cursed journey?

Kamchatka 2?

Really the same picture, but more likely to be from the game then the massive injustices piling up. Kinda makes a point about the american people there.

Or “10 inch Mutant Ninja Turtles” by Wood Rocket, who are we to judge.

Yeah, I would use Snowden as an example in the opposite column.

Sometimes I wonder if people have conflated coverage with results, like how people are still demanding the release of the epstein files and not the heads of the people already implicated in what was released so far. Snowden, the panama files, ect. did not have the effect that should be expected. Like yeah the governments spying on you, and then instead of doing anything us people just rolled over and bought a new Iphone.

I think a trillionaire exists due to all of this.

Yes, we live in a world where dystopian stories from just a few decades ago are looking good.

At least the president in that movie gave a shit about his people.

Yes, I am sure they do good work. But you can see the issue of making data driven policy is dangerous based on biased data, right? Your point is that we should include at least one “rapist” every time someone calls in for support, making the number of days behind bars on average stupid low for that category of crime. The help line is not vetting or investigating these incidents, they are not set up to nor should they be made to do something so far outside their mandate. This group also does lobbying to update the legal setting, something that although noble is not without issue and definitely involves a clear bias that makes them almost as bad as the police that toss rape kits as far as a data source.

So now if we take your example we are going to see a unverified massive spike in sexual violence, and a massive decrease in time behind bars per incident. This would not have the effect you think it will, this will bury the real issue of already low sentences and conviction rates under so much anonymous noise that any real data driven policy will be impossible. In fact I would not be shocked to see laws passed that just re defined the crime to “fix” the wild numbers, further hurting the chances of justice. The very idea that a help line that will pick up the phone and assist regardless of facts or understanding (as is appropriate for such a help line, I would not have it another way) makes such a data set useful in a wet finger in the wind way at best.

Those do not sound like stats.

I do believe there are a lot more crimes committed then reported, don’t assume I have a position for your narrative. With that being said, please tell me how a reasonable person would not take below as I did?

Stats on rape and sexual assault should include instances where the perpetrator doesn’t see any jail time because the rape and sexual assault still happens.

Just because a victim doesn’t report does not mean that the perpetrator is innocent.

You want statistics to include unreported crimes as in your first sentence. Your last sentence calls for an implied guilt of everyone implicated in a sexual assault, no beyond that, as you said “… A victim doesn’t report does not mean that the perpetrator…”

This is how you get a police state, where anyone at any time can be destroyed when a person with more power wants it. Do you honestly think this will help victims? Even more so sexual assault victims? The idea that you want stats (that have in this day an age a shaky relationship with the truth) to start including make believe data points in order to push an objective is so bassackwards that I can only see it coming from an american.

Most of us know crimes (more so of a sexual intent) are under reported, the idea that numbers should be fudged (once again that you clearly imply) to make the report fit better with any narrative (good intentions and all that) is so mind numbingly insane that they made a movie about how bad an idea it is.

Wait, hold on here. Are you asking why they don’t report numbers on unreported crimes? And more so you want numbers on average jail time to include not convicted and even not accused individuals as rapists?

You would love the movie Minority Report.

PEDOPHILE cheerleader more so, somehow a more pathetic role.

The conviction helps, even if the sentence is light.