Parking brake is not the same. Try googling it. Or think of the physics -your car can go from 60 to zero a lot faster than it can go zero to 60. Or watch the top gear episode where they test it on a mustang with a thousand horsepower and stock brakes.
The place that is both technically possible, and desirable from a privacy protection view, to do this restriction is on the devices used by children, not on the entire internet.
Parent clicks “this device is for a child” and the device filters the internet and automatically uses safe search, etc, in a way that cannot be disabled without the parents pin. It can advertise its self to online services as a youth device (thats how google safe search already can work). The parent is in control and the child gets protected. Its not rocket science.
They will specifically outlaw privacy protecting VPN services. You will still be able to buy a commercial VPN service, handing over your ID to the VPN company, which will have to track everything its users do for compliance.
The worst part is they will use “free” VPN apps. You think botnets are bad now? Wait till a billion kids install these apps on their phones.
Also recognise that for some people, things breaking is either scary, or just more annoying than ads. They expect ads, but freak out when a website is broken -which will always be a possibility with adblockers due to the nature of them.
Helium is a chromium browser, so unless they plan a hard fork, will be in the same boat as the rest when this is implemented.
Serving headscale is basically a webserver plus a couple of ports. Super minimal hardware requirement but the typical difficulty of needing those ports on a publicly addressable static IP or dynamic DNS.
I feel for people wanting to be security researchers with a conscience. They used to get thrown in jail or hit with lawsuits. Things progressed to where they could get a tiny fraction of the black market value as a bug bounty, and possibly even make a basic living doing that, but we are probably headed back in the other direction.
Meanwhile, black hats are sitting in a resort pool somewhere spending the half million some authoritarian regime paid them for a simmilar exploit, trying to drink enough all-inclusive booze to avoid thinking of the people getting their fingernails pried off in some goulag after getting exposed via said exploit.
The fact that American trucks and SUVs don’t have forward facing cameras that activate at slow speeds to prevent driving over kids hidden in their insane blind spots while navigating parking lots and driveways should be criminal. The headlight situation as well (Europe is actually doing something, fwiw). We also had external airbag tech to prevent pedestrian deaths decades ago and with modern vision systems they could be incredibly cheap and highly reliable today, but its not criminal to ignore that tech.
They even fought seatbelt requirements for gods sake. The auto industry are depraved. Let’s not give any of them a pass.
Edit: I can’t help but add that everything above is so damned cheap it would be a rounding error on a vehicles manufacturing cost and wouldn’t impact their shitty “design goals and styling” one iota. I’m not even suggesting changing the shape or size of them here.
Yes, radar was found to be useless at highway speeds for stationary objects because if it responded to such events, you get sudden, emergency “ghost braking.” Radar is so low resolution, it cannot tell the difference between the back of a tractor trailer and a large sign or overpass.
I don’t like this either as it seems to lead people to overestimate the capability of lidar and radar systems (and radar is worse than useless. False positives are dangerous too).
There is NO automated system on the road that is proven. Waymos and shit will also end up killing people. Please, people, don’t do their marketing for them. The road system and cars are a lethal system with dangerous tradeoffs by design.
They still have ultrasound sensors for slow speeds like parking. Either they failed or he was at roadway speed when he entered the driveway.
Yeah, its just the new version of “my gas peddal got stuck” or the more general “my car accelerated out of nowhere”
FYI, neither actually happen, despite thousands of claims going back decades, and if they did, brakes easily overpower engines. People confuse their pedals and don’t believe it.
I use lane assist and traffic aware cruise to keep my shoulders and (bad) knee physically relaxed on long highway stretches. That said, I would probably choose to tolerate the inevitable day of neck and/or knee pain if it meant no one was using this stuff. Automation bias is scary.
FSD is not capable of dodging a deer - it just brakes.
I run head scale on a Vps and it has been 100% reliable and provides an exit node for me via that VPS. But you are going to have the exact same issue, I think with your VPN.
You want your default route from the exit node to go over mullivard’s interface, but you need wireguard or tailscale to talk to the other clients directly, via their clearnet IP. You can tell the exit nodes tailscale/wireguard client to bind the clearnet interface, but that may or may not help. Mullivard probably takes the default gateway, which will likely cut off the clients. You could set dedicated routes to the IP addresses of the clients, but they can change if those clients are mobile. You will need to maintain a routing table somehow or keep the pre-existing connection active (fragile).
I am sure its well trodden ground, just be aware that head scale probably won’t solve your problem automatically. Its a routing and or firewall config issue.
Head scale is actually a simpler implementation rather than the heart of what tailscale uses directly. It is perfectly complete for a single persons homelab application IMHO. Would be easy for the community to maintain a fork, but its also good to see other approaches that solve the same problem.
The GPL3 clients? They can relicense and stop developing those, but we would still have them in their current state.
Because having that much power and money literally causes brain damage.
Being insulated from consequences and reality for long enough, and you lose access to the feedback that keeps that squishy neural network from going heywire.