Subjectively, it feels similar to models we used a year or two ago. Not that drastically different from what Anthropic and OpenAI offer today, but slightly worse. For instance, for complex coding tasks it offers basic solutions, while Claude often offers more options and details - as if it knows more.
Objectively, benchmarks. Mistral looks comparable to other open weight models (as another user mentioned), but not as good otherwise.
I understand the meaning of 666, but what’s wrong with 67?
Maybe, but Mistral is a commercial company that offers commercial products that can’t really compete with OpenAI, Anthropic, and the others. That’s what I meant.
“Somewhat” is doing a lot of heavy lifting there 😂 How much time does it take to process your average request?
I care, thanks for asking.
I don’t know what models power Lumo, but Mistral is so far behind the competition it’s not even funny.
That’s cool. But is there a playground for children somewhere?
They’re all essentially trying to manipulate Trump by playing into his narcissism. This is bad and not what I want to see, but it might not be an (intentional) act of submission.
Lost Records: Bloom & Rage
What a waste of time it was. A game about nothing where nothing happens. How the mighty have fallen.
Vampyr and Banishers were interesting though. Rough, but interesting.
I wonder what companies that have integrated AI into all their workflows and processes are planning to do when the times comes to pay real price for the tokens.
Nothing. They aren’t thinking ahead.
Yeah it’s funny reading now that Windows 10 was good. I remember how people didn’t want to migrate from Windows 7/8 to Windows 10 like people today don’t want to migrate to Windows 11. Perhaps back then the issue was even bigger than today.
There is this game developer who was working on his game for 2 years. He was planning to release his game soon, but somebody stole the name and the idea. Crazy stuff.
Tbf most major attacks we saw recently are cross-platform thanks to npm. AUR has always been a security risk.
But your brain should be the best antivirus you have.
It’s useful to use brain, but any security layer has holes which is why it’s good to have several layers. Some attacks might be way beyond user’s understanding or come from trusted sources.
It’s just a summary of a recent interview, relax.
Other people is only half of the equation. You have a responsibility to ensure that the cars did in fact stopped.
a breach of one container means access to the data of all containers
How so? Each service uses its own database with credentials that provide access only to that database. Unless on top of a breach in your container there is some zero-day in your DBMS - which I find highly improbable - no other data will be affected.
Given that database management systems already provide clear separation between services in the form of databases, users, and permissions, I see no need to spin up new database instances for each individual service. You say it’s easier to back up tightly coupled services and databases, but why? I find it easier to back up a single database server than multiple servers.
The real concern with shared databases is performance: some services, under certain conditions, can generate load that degrades database performance for everyone. But that’s usually a problem for large enterprises, not self-hosters.
He looks so happy these days. He must be delighted: not only he won for Ferrari, he also did it with such a strong performance. If Ferrari can keep up, it can get interesting given the reliability issues Mercedes and their customers have.
Sure, totally depends on your needs. But it’d be great if we had one of them frontier models in Europe.